EVE Search - Sticky:[Rubicon] Sisters of EVE faction ships

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Sticky:[Rubicon] Sisters of EVE faction ships

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 20 post(s)
Phoenix Jones Shockwave Innovations Surely You're Joking 193	Posted - 2013.10.24 15:36:00 - [1] - Quote Thank you for toning it down a little, but I would suggest giving others who don't wield the mighty laser an option to use these ships. I would change the optimal range to a tracking enhancement for all turrets, so now people can decide to use lasers, or go with another option. But I get the reason why the laser direction. Stabbers are totally broken http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15116553
Phoenix Jones Shockwave Innovations Surely You're Joking 194	Posted - 2013.10.24 23:38:00 - [2] - Quote Maximus Andendare wrote: Harvey James wrote: and ofc droneships are -1 slots I'd still like a satisfactory answer as to why drone ships are -1 slot count. If its because of the tired argument that drones offer utility, then the obvious argument there is that ships that have primary weapon systems other than drones are afforded a tremendous amount more utility with their drones, because they don't have to sacrifice any damage potential in order to use utility drones. Yet, drone ships that use drones as their primary weapon system have to say "ok, I'm going to not do any damage and use EC drones instead." Why is it that a Drake, for example, can use all 6 launchers AND a flight of EC drones AND get +1 slot count over a similarly-classed drone ship? I would love to know the answer to this too. CCP should probably relook at all the droneboats and drones themselves. And I'm not sure what happened there mynnna, but expressing to burn down all t3's in a thread that has 0 to do with them.... It's just really not the place for it. So much so, the sisters of eve ships should really not exist. There is no need for a combat capable cloak vessel, regardless of whether it's an "exploration" ship. We have bombers, recons, t3, black ops, all of these are serving a specific duty. Creating a general "to the public", ship would not only unbalance others, but would cause more chaos regarding the want for cloaking vessels that can dps. Right now the only vessel that anybody really considers a danger is the proteus, and even if they tank it the things as agile as a bowling ball in a mud-pit. Creating more cloak capable ships is not the direction for balance in this game. Its hard enough to hunt around for people, but giving people the capability to explore the entire game in a combat vessel.... People scream about afk cloaking, cloaked t3's, crazy dps and huge cruiser tanks... And CCP releases another one? The frigate is fine. The cruiser is not. I don't like where the chat is going, nor the ship direction and I like droneboats Don't attack the community. Stabbers are totally broken http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15116553

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.